The medieval witch-hunts have long been depicted as part of a "war against women" conducted exclusively or overwhelmingly by men, especially those in positions of central authority. Deborah Willis notes that "more polemical" feminist accounts "are likely to portray the witch as a heroic protofeminist resisting patriarchal oppression and a wholly innocent victim of a male-authored reign of terror designed to keep women in their place." (Willis, Malevolent Nurture, p. 12.)
In fact, the stigmatizing, victimizing, and murdering of accused "witches" is more accurately seen as a collaborative enterprise between men and women at the local level. "The historical record suggests that both men and women found it easiest to fix these fantasies [of witchcraft], and turn them into horrible reality, when they were attached to women. It is really crucial to understand that misogyny in this sense was not reserved to men alone, but could be just as intense among women." Most of the accusations originated in "conflicts [that] normally opposed one woman to another, with men liable to become involved only at a later stage as ancillaries to the original dispute." Briggs adds that "most informal accusations were made by women against other women, ... [and only] leaked slowly across to the men who controlled the political structures of local society." At the trial level, his research on the French province of Lorraine found that
women did testify in large numbers against other women, making up 43 per cent of witnesses in these cases on average, and predominating in 30 per cent of them. ... A more sophisticated count for the English Home Circuit by Clive Holmes shows that the proportion of women witnesses rose from around 38 per cent in the last years of Queen Elizabeth to 53 per cent after the Restoration. ... It appears that women were active in building up reputations by gossip, deploying counter-magic and accusing suspects; crystallization into formal prosecution, however, needed the intervention of men, preferably of fairly high status in the community." (Briggs, Witches & Neighbours, pp. 264-65, 270, 273, 282.)
Deborah Willis's study of "Witch-Hunting and Maternal Power in Early Modern England" similarly finds it "clear ... that women were actively involved in making witchcraft accusations against their female neighbours":
[Alan] Macfarlane finds that as many women as men informed against witches in the 291 Essex cases he studied; about 55 percent of those who believed they had been bewitched were female. The number of witchcraft quarrels that began between women may actually have been higher; in some cases, it appears that the husband as "head of household" came forward to make statements on behalf of his wife, although the central quarrel had taken place between her and another woman. ... It may, then, be misleading to equate "informants" with "accusers": the person who gave a statement to authorities was not necessarily the person directly quarreling with the witch. Other studies support a figure in the range of 60 percent. In Peter Rushton's examination of slander cases in the Durham church courts, women took action against other women who had labeled them witches in 61 percent of the cases. ... J.A. Sharpe also notes the prevalence of women as accusers in seventeenth-century Yorkshire cases, concluding that "on a village level witchcraft seems to have been something peculiarly enmeshed in women's quarrels." To a considerable extent, then, village-level witch-hunting was women's work. (Willis, Malevolent Nurture, pp. 35-36.)
These comments and data serve as a reminder that gendercide against women may be initiated and perpetrated, substantially or predominantly, by "other women," just as gendercide against men is carried out overwhelmingly by "other men." The case of female infanticide can also be cited in this regard. Patriarchal power, however, was ubiquitous at all later stages of witchcraft proceedings. Men were exclusively the prosecutors, judges, jailers, and executioners -- of women and men alike -- in Europe's emerging modern legal system.
Books You Might Enjoy:
Thomas Moore - Candle Magick For Love
Richard Weiss - Recipes For Immortality
Marian Green - A Witch Alone
Thomas Muldoon - Numerology For The 21st Century
Janet Farrar - A Witches Bible The Complete Witches Handbook
Welcome here at Neopagan World! Have fun and enjoy our community of Pagans Wiccans and Neopagans - Wicca Wiccans Pagans. Be different.. be Neopagan!
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Who Was Responsible For Great Witches Hunt
Popular Posts
-
Book: The Book Of Raziel The Angel Or Sefer Raziel Hamalakh by Medieval Grimoires The Book of Raziel the Angel is a medieval Hebrew Grimoir...
-
A complete account of the ingredients of the witch-idea or even of the genuine witch-cult would fill a volume like this. We should have to ...
-
Book: Grimoire For The Green Witch A Complete Book Of Shadows by Ann Moura The author of the popular Green Witchcraft series presents her ...
-
Book: The Book Of Forbidden Knowledge by Basil Crouch This is the most dangerous book you will ever hold in you hands. It is books of secre...
-
- "If someone comes and you don't want them to come back, put salt and black pepper on the carpet. When they leave, take a broom...
-
"Spell OF THE Idol - BY DOREEN VALIENTE" Our aristocrat of the Moon, Enchantments Emperor, And of midnight the persuasive sorc...
-
As most Americans know, witch hunts also affected the American colonies. The Salem witch trials pursued the Massachusetts Puritans have en...
-
For three centuries of early modern European history, diverse societies were consumed by a panic over alleged witches in their midst. W...
-
Book: The Only Wiccan Spell Book You Will Ever Need For Love Happiness And Prosperity by Marian Singer The fundamentals of spellcraft-all i...